<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changeling (Review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/</link>
	<description>Your guide to cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 05:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: garment daily business reports</title>
		<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5721</link>
		<dc:creator>garment daily business reports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutprintreview.com/?p=3106#comment-5721</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Recommeneded websites...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recommeneded websites&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Wotzke</title>
		<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Wotzke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutprintreview.com/?p=3106#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Yes, Jolie&#039;s oscar nomination is quite surprising given how she just seems to turn on the waterworks for the most of the film. If that can get you nominated, then Will Smith should have got a nom for Seven Pounds... 
 
No it&#039;s not Eastwoods best, but I was just so taken by the story I found myself glued for the entire film. It was thoroughly entertaining, but not exactly awards material. 
 
Thanks again Sam for dropping by. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jolie&#039;s oscar nomination is quite surprising given how she just seems to turn on the waterworks for the most of the film. If that can get you nominated, then Will Smith should have got a nom for Seven Pounds&#8230; </p>
<p>No it&#039;s not Eastwoods best, but I was just so taken by the story I found myself glued for the entire film. It was thoroughly entertaining, but not exactly awards material. </p>
<p>Thanks again Sam for dropping by. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Wotzke</title>
		<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Wotzke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutprintreview.com/?p=3106#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>Yes, Jolie&#039;s oscar nomination is quite surprising given how she just seems to turn on the waterworks for the most of the film. If that can get you nominated, then Will Smith should have got a nom for Seven Pounds... 
 
No it&#039;s not Eastwoods best, but I was just so taken by the story I found myself glued for the entire film. It was thoroughly entertaining, but not exactly awards material. 
 
Thanks again Sam for dropping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jolie&#039;s oscar nomination is quite surprising given how she just seems to turn on the waterworks for the most of the film. If that can get you nominated, then Will Smith should have got a nom for Seven Pounds&#8230; </p>
<p>No it&#039;s not Eastwoods best, but I was just so taken by the story I found myself glued for the entire film. It was thoroughly entertaining, but not exactly awards material. </p>
<p>Thanks again Sam for dropping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Juliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutprintreview.com/?p=3106#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Anders, you like this film more than I do, but I&#039;ll admit it does have it&#039;s moments and the period detail, set design and cinematography are all first-rate.  As you rightly note Jolie&#039;s performance loses steam (if fact she is a veritable crying-machine, whose nomination for Best Actress was underserved when you realize both Sally Hawkins and Kristen-Scott Thomas, and even the Russian actress in Sokurov&#039;s ALEXAXANDRE were bypassed, not that the latter had one chance in a million) and some jarring flashbacks violate the delicate tone of the film.  It&#039;s fine, but certainly not among Eastwood&#039;s more memorable achievements.  Again, you write with style and insight, and your opinion has support in the critical ranks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anders, you like this film more than I do, but I&#039;ll admit it does have it&#039;s moments and the period detail, set design and cinematography are all first-rate.  As you rightly note Jolie&#039;s performance loses steam (if fact she is a veritable crying-machine, whose nomination for Best Actress was underserved when you realize both Sally Hawkins and Kristen-Scott Thomas, and even the Russian actress in Sokurov&#039;s ALEXAXANDRE were bypassed, not that the latter had one chance in a million) and some jarring flashbacks violate the delicate tone of the film.  It&#039;s fine, but certainly not among Eastwood&#039;s more memorable achievements.  Again, you write with style and insight, and your opinion has support in the critical ranks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Juliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutprintreview.com/?p=3106#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>Anders, you like this film more than I do, but I&#039;ll admit it does have it&#039;s moments and the period detail, set design and cinematography are all first-rate.  As you rightly note Jolie&#039;s performance loses steam (if fact she is a veritable crying-machine, whose nomination for Best Actress was underserved when you realize both Sally Hawkins and Kristen-Scott Thomas, and even the Russian actress in Sokurov&#039;s ALEXAXANDRE were bypassed, not that the latter had one chance in a million) and some jarring flashbacks violate the delicate tone of the film.  It&#039;s fine, but certainly not among Eastwood&#039;s more memorable achievements.  Again, you write with style and insight, and your opinion has support in the critical ranks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anders, you like this film more than I do, but I&#039;ll admit it does have it&#039;s moments and the period detail, set design and cinematography are all first-rate.  As you rightly note Jolie&#039;s performance loses steam (if fact she is a veritable crying-machine, whose nomination for Best Actress was underserved when you realize both Sally Hawkins and Kristen-Scott Thomas, and even the Russian actress in Sokurov&#039;s ALEXAXANDRE were bypassed, not that the latter had one chance in a million) and some jarring flashbacks violate the delicate tone of the film.  It&#039;s fine, but certainly not among Eastwood&#039;s more memorable achievements.  Again, you write with style and insight, and your opinion has support in the critical ranks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Film Production </title>
		<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Film Production </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutprintreview.com/?p=3106#comment-449</guid>
		<description>A great review on movie &quot;Changeling&quot;.  Angelina Jolie&#039;s performance  is amazing.  I like her movie &quot;Tomb Raider&quot;. very much. 
 
Jane </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great review on movie &quot;Changeling&quot;.  Angelina Jolie&#039;s performance  is amazing.  I like her movie &quot;Tomb Raider&quot;. very much. </p>
<p>Jane </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Film Production</title>
		<link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/changeling-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>Film Production</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutprintreview.com/?p=3106#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>A great review on movie &quot;Changeling&quot;.  Angelina Jolie&#039;s performance  is amazing.  I like her movie &quot;Tomb Raider&quot;. very much. 
 
Jane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great review on movie &quot;Changeling&quot;.  Angelina Jolie&#039;s performance  is amazing.  I like her movie &quot;Tomb Raider&quot;. very much. </p>
<p>Jane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 610/610 objects using disk: basic

Served from: moviedex.com @ 2012-05-24 08:23:16 -->
